After the decade – Remembering Benazir Bhutto

She was a heroine born in a civilization of heroes. The very being of her – womanhood – was inherently anti-establishment; at odds with establishment of every kind, be it political, social, traditional, or religious. All she did was to hang in there and they trembled with fear. That made all the difference.

She belonged to the tribe of dreamers. She did not die because she wanted to restore democracy in Pakistan. She died because she was a dreamer. This is what dreamers do. They die. Often young.

Hers was a struggle much more monumental than that of her father. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto rode on the wave of populist socialism in the late 1960s. He was the son of his times and his dream shared by millions of dreamers living in the other parts of the world. BB’s struggle, on the other hand, was much more solitary.She lived and struggled through the time when “spring of Nations” was turning into “Autumn of Nations”. The Left was waning and the era of ideology and strong leaders was about to end. If there is one word that defines Benazir Bhutto it is resistance. The resistance against the overarching role of military in Pakistani politics and the burgeoning religious extremism in post-Zia era. She was a dreamer who dreamed of resistance, lived by it, and died by it.

Not unlike during her lifetime, she still is a highly polarized figure. Today she is either eulogized as martyr of democracy or rebuffed as a feudal who inherited the throne. The question however remains as to her legacy and relevance in today’s Pakistan. Is Benazir Bhutto still relevant after one decade?

The answer is a resounding yes. Her relevance is beyond politics. She is not relevant because she governed the country twice or she made some political alliances. She is relevant because she has come to be a yardstick against which we can gauge our current socio-political conditions.

Now imagine a national level leaderreciting the following verses in a public gathering and stretch your imagination a little further and imagine a woman reciting these verses:

“Mazhabke jo byopaariheiN

Who sab se baribimaariheiN

In jhuteaurmakaaroN se

MazhabkethekedaroN se

Main BaghihuN”

(These traders of religion are the worst disease. I rebel from these liars, hypocrites, and guardians of religion)

She recited this poem, written by Khalid Javed Jan, publicly many times. Could she have done that today? Probably not. Probably she would have insisted to recite it anyway. That’s why she is not alive today.

In recent years state has capitulated time and again in the name of mainstreaming militants, peace accords, and avoiding the backlash. There has scarcely been any political opposition to yielding the space to non-state actors. It was back in 2007 when emotions were running high in the aftermath of Lal Masjid operation and no one dared to utter a word that she was heard saying this on Britain’s Sky TV:

“I’m glad there was no cease-fire with the militants in the mosque because cease-fires simply embolden the militants. There will be a backlash, but at some time we have to stop appeasing the militants. We can’t afford to keep appeasing them.”

Her support for Lal Masjid operation was probably one of the major reasons that she lost her life. She would probably have done the same today if need be. But then she is not alive anymore.

We are living in a hate-filled world today. The us vs them binary feels to be the order of the day. It takes a deep historical understanding to see through the fog of half-baked truths and it takes immense courage to see the need of introspection. In her posthumous book Reconciliation: Islam, Democracy and the West, she writes:

“Muslims are dealing not with a clash between civilizations but rather with a clash within a civilization. The most critical battle for the hearts and the souls of successor generation of Muslim leaders, and for the passion of the Muslims around the world, is not a battle with the West… It is about the lack of tolerance that some interpretations show for other interpretations within Islam or other religions outside Islam. In other words, the real clash within and outside Islam is the battle between the past and the future.”

She got it right. It was the clash within a civilization that got her killed and not the clash between civilizations. How many political leaders can comment today on the most pressing issue faced by us with such astuteness and deep historical insight?

She came back to Pakistan on October 18th, 2007. The way the songs in the streets of Karachi turned into fear and loathing by the midnight captures the 70-year-long political history of Pakistan in a perfect manner. After midnight, she knew there was no going back. She knew what she was to do. She knew what dreamers do. They die. Often young.

She was a kind of person who make great characters in novels. More than history books, she will be remembered in folk tales. Benazir Bhutto will be remembered until the last of us is able to feel pain when hurt.

You might also like More from author

1 Comment

  1. akmal says

    WOW ,now i understand why pple can vote for the likes of zardri or nawaz & even mqm or mulana diesel, BENAZIR wasnt a dreamer you pple are who have no knowledge of what the pple u make into hero,s (male or females) are really like .lets take benazir educated in uk had everything handed on a plate married to mr 10% had her children educated in uk they had everything handed on a plate too,now for her struggles she struggled for power not for good of pak and there is difference ,she knew THAT her husband was robbing the country what did she do ? nothing , she even admitted buying pple off he self, which means promoting corruption, as for some developments in pak thats what leaders of countrys do its not a favour it is their job.i saw her speak on tv programs in uk when she was in exile & she was so desperate to be in power again she even said she would allow a lot more say so by uk & usa on pak policies .so stop for moment and think how come all these so called leaders say that they doing u favours when all they do is their job(even that is not done in the interest of pak or pple of pak but for them self) & how come they all get richer while u and pak get poorer , their children get educated in uk, pak children have no education ,they go for treatment abroad while u cant even get treated in pak .THEY ROBB(ppp,pmln,mqm,mulana dsl etc) U ,THEY KILL U (mqm & pmln model town) & THEY HOLD UR CHILREN BACK THEY HOLD UR COUNTRY BACK & U SING THEIR PRAISES , NO WONDER THEY ARE DOING IT AGAIN & AGAIN TO U (look at pple coming out to support nawaz ,( only in pak pple support some one who robbed their home, & where & how rich are his children) U MAY GET OFFENDED BY WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN BUT TRUST ME IT IS THE TRUTH & THE QUICKER U LEARN THE BETTER IT WILL BE FOR U & PAK OR ELSE GET READY FOR BILLO & MARYUM TOO

Reply To akmal

Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.